|
by Elliot Swan 
Search Engine Optimization, commonly referred to as SEO, is quite important when
it comes to marketing a site. There are millions of searches each day, and most
webmasters want these searches to lead visitors (or even better yet, customers)
to their site. But how to let people find your site though search engines? Well,
in order to effectively optimize for search engines one should probably first
know at least a little about the search engines themselves--including what they
look for when ranking sites in their SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages).
So let’s find out which search engines are worth optimizing for and take
a closer look at things they value when deciding where to place you in their
SERPs. This is quite significant information we will be coming back to in later
articles when deciding on effective ways to optimize our sites.
First off, let’s see how different search engines compare to each other
in how much they are used. After all, we don’t want to waste our (quite
valuable) time with a search engine that’s hardly used, and we don’t
want to skip a big one, either (after all, it would be a shame to not give as
many users as possible the pleasure of visiting your site and possibly buying
your products).
The Statistics
Search Engine Watch (http://searchenginewatch.com/reports/article.php/3099931)
posted some percentages as to a possible estimate of how much each engine was
used in May of 2005.
Not surprisingly, Google definitely took the top with 38.3%. Yahoo took their
share of 18.4%, and MSN grabbed 15.6%. Which ones come after that? You can check
the link out for yourself to see, but I think it’s pretty safe to say
that these are definitely the top three we need to be worried about.
So now I know what you’re thinking: “Do they differ much in how
they rank pages?”
Yep.
I know what you’re thinking now, too. “Then how do they differ?”
Let’s start with MSN and work our way up to #1 (Google).
MSN
Though MSN is the relatively new kid on the block, there are a couple things
we can know about it. It loves to see good markup and in-text keywords. In other
words, it pays close attention to things like <title> and <h> tags,
and also pays attention to what you actually say in your content. Backlinks
are also taken into account—i.e. who’s linking to you, and what
descriptive text they used in their links. It doesn’t, however, use your
meta descriptions.
Yahoo
Yahoo, like MSN, loves good markup such as <title> and <h> tags,
and pays attention to on-site keywords. Unlike MSN, however, they will use your
meta descriptions.
{mosgoogle}
Google
We’ve now arrived at the big G, holding approximately 38.3% of searches.
What should we know about this one?
Well, Google has two major concerns: Titles and backlinks. We mentioned backlinks
back when we were talking about MSN, but what exactly are they?
Backlinks
Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backlinks) says the following about
them:
Backlinks are incoming links to a website or web log. The number of backlinks
is an indication of the popularity or importance of that website.
Search engines often use the number of backlinks that a website has as one
of the factors for determining that website's search engine ranking. For example,
Google's PageRank algorithm uses backlinks to help determine a site's rank.
To see a site's PageRank, you need to use the Google Toolbar for Microsoft's
Internet Explorer, view the bar graph indicating a website's PageRank in Google's
website directory, or download the PageRank plugin for Mozilla Firefox.
You can determine the approximate number of backlinks a website has when
doing a search at Google by adding "link:" before the website's
URL….
Well that last paragraph isn’t true, Google doesn’t like to show
all your backlinks anymore, but if you use the same procedure on MSN, you can
get a pretty good count.
The rest of that definition will serve us pretty well, though, if we know
what PageRank is. So going back to Google, let’s see what they say about
it on their technology page (http://www.google.com/technology/):
PageRank relies on the uniquely democratic nature of the web by using its
vast link structure as an indicator of an individual page's value. In essence,
Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page
B. But, Google looks at more than the sheer volume of votes, or links a page
receives; it also analyzes the page that casts the vote. Votes cast by pages
that are themselves "important" weigh more heavily and help to make
other pages "important."
Important, high-quality sites receive a higher PageRank, which Google remembers
each time it conducts a search. Of course, important pages mean nothing to
you if they don't match your query. So, Google combines PageRank with sophisticated
text-matching techniques to find pages that are both important and relevant
to your search. Google goes far beyond the number of times a term appears
on a page and examines all aspects of the page's content (and the content
of the pages linking to it) to determine if it's a good match for your query.
This means then, that the more important pages that link to you, and the more
relevant these important pages are to your site, the higher you will be for
searches looking for your content. The keywords in the links going to you help
Google find out what type of content you have as well. MSN also incorporates
this approach, but MSN relies more on your on-site content and keywords than
Google does.
So What Good Does This Do Me?
Many people who claim to be SEO experts take this information and use it to
exploit the search engines, to trick the engines into giving their sites high
rankings. An example of this would be to stuff keywords on a page for search
engines to find then hide all this text from normal, human users. THIS TYPE
OF CONDUCT IS CONCIDERED UNETHICAL AND CAN GET YOU IN TROUBLE WITH THE SEARCH
ENGINES. Google is very well known for catching cheaters.
What knowing all this information will allow us to do as webmasters will be
to more accurately show search engines what our page is about and as a result
become higher on relevant SERPS. In future articles, we will explore some of
the ways to do this.
Contributed by Elliot Swan (click the profile icon to view his bio)
|
What about ads? Written by joem on 2005-09-24 11:02:29 Does like google take backlinks through advertisments (image ads)? | Re: What about ads? Written by elliothere on 2005-09-24 11:13:04 Good question. The thing with ads like that is that sometimes you're being linked to, and sometimes somebody else is being linked to. So they might be crawling once and see a link to you, then 5 minutes later go back and they're not. So I'm not sure if it would give you too much benefit, but I've never really looked into it too much. Now one thing that is a definite no-no is a high PR site selling their PageRank to other sites through text ads with the pure purpose of gaining PR. Several big sites had their PR "frozen" a few months ago for doing this. |
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register. |